Nashrieh Shimi va Mohandesi Shimi Iran

Nashrieh Shimi va Mohandesi Shimi Iran

Design and Construction of a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) to Determine Particle Size Distribution of Aerosolerosols

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Ebrahim Abedini
Keramat Bahmani Ghaed
Mehdi Tarasi
Seyed Mohamad Abtahi
Hosein Shadman
Department of Applied Chemistry, Malek-Ashtar University of Technology, Isfahan, I.R. IRAN
Abstract
In this study, the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) was constructed and used to determine the particles size distribution of submicron aerosols. SMPS Spectrometer is widely used as the standard method to measure airborne particle size distributions. This particle sizer is also routinely used to make accurate nanoparticle size measurements of particles suspended in liquids. The SMPS consists of the constant output atomizer, the particle charge neutralizer, Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA) and Condensation Particle Counter (CPC). Each part of this system was designed and constructed separately and then primary experiments were done. In the next step assembling of all devices was done to create a SMPS system. In this system, the Polydispersed aerosols were created from the atomizer inside the diffusion drier tube to eliminate their humidity. The polydispersed aerosols exiting the drier were passed through the neutralizer to obtain a known charge distribution. Then the aerosol stream was classified by the DMA at a selected voltage to extract a known particle diameter. The exiting particles from the DMA were led to the CPC in order to count particles number and to measure the size distribution. Calibration of SMPS performance by monodispersed particles with 100 nm size. This method is independent of the refractive index of the particle or fluid and has a high degree of absolute sizing accuracy and measurement repeatability. High-resolution data up to 250 channels, broad size range (from 1 nm to 1,000 nm), fast measurements (complete size distributions in 10 minutes) and wide concentration range from 1 to 107 particles/cm3 are some advantages of this instrument over the existing systems.
Keywords
Scanning mobility particle sizer
Differential mobility analyzer
Condensation particle counter
Neutralizer
Atomizer
Subjects
[1] Hinds W.C., “Aerosol Technology”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1999).
[2] Colbeck I.; “Physical and Chemical Properties of Aerosols”, Chapman & Hall; Cholester – UK, (1998).
[3] Keady P.B., F.R. Quant, Sem G.J., “Differential Mobility Particle Sizer: A New Instrument for High-Resolution Aerosol Size Distribution Measurement Below 1 μm”, TSI Incorporated, St. Paul, MN, (1983).
[4] Liu B.Y.H., Lee K.W., An Aerosol Generator of High Stability, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 36: 861–865 (1975).
[5] Alofs D.J., Balakumar P., Inversion to Obtain Aerosol Size Distributions From Measurements with a Differential Mobility Analyzer, L Aerosol Sci, 13(6): 513-527 (1982).
[6] Intra P. Tippayawong N., An Overview of Differential Mobility Analyzers for Size Classification of Nanometer-Sized Aerosol Particles, Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 30(2): 243-256 (2008).
[7] Chen D.R., Pui D.Y.H., Numerical Modeling of the Performance of Differential Mobility Analyzers for Nanometer Aerosol Measurement, Journal of Aerosol Science, 28(6): 985-1004 (1997).
[8] Stommel Y.G., Riebel U., A Corona-Discharge-Based Aerosol Neutralizer Designed for Use with the SMPS-System, Journal of Electrostatics, 63: 917–921 (2005).
[9] Romay F.J., Liu B.Y.H., Pui D.Y.H., A Sonic Jet Corona Ionizer for Electrostatic Discharge and Aerosol Neutralization, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 20: 31-41 (1994).
[10] Adachi M., Pui D.Y.H., Liu B.Y.H., Aerosol Charge Neutralization by a Corona Ionizer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 18: 48-58 (1993).
[11] Agarwal J.K., Sem G.J., Continuous Flow Single-Particle-Counting Condensation Nucleus Counter, J. Aerosol Sci., 11: 343-357 (1980).
[12] Marti J.J., Weber R.J., Saros M.T., Vasilou J.G., McMurry P.H., Modification of the TSI 3025 Condensation Particle Counter for Pulse Height Analysis, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 25: 214-218 (1996).