Nashrieh Shimi va Mohandesi Shimi Iran

Nashrieh Shimi va Mohandesi Shimi Iran

Design and Evaluation of Novel Potent G-protein Coupled Receptor Kinase Inhibitors Using Virtual Screening Methods

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Department of Chemistry, Payame Noor University. Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The G-protein receptor kinases are members of the most effective enzymes in the incidence of some important disease such as cardiovascular diseases, hypertension and Alzheimer’s disease. One of these enzymes is a protein with PDB code: 3v5w in the protein data bank. The in-silico study on the interaction of variety of inhibitor ligands with this enzyme was performed. The results of the interaction between selected ligands and target protein were investigated and analyzed using molecular screening by molecular docking simulation methods. The calculations of some factors such as binding energy between ligands and target protein, non-bonding interactions of ligands in the active site of enzyme and analysis of the result of molecular docking scoring were performed. The results were compared with a standard inhibitor (Paroxetine). Furthermore, to better evaluate and correct the selection of the lead compound, the related properties of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) of high-scored ligands were compared with pharmacokinetic factors of Paroxetine using ADMETLab 2.0 data server platform. As the result, the compound L10, (4R,5S)-5-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxymethyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidin-2-one was introduced as a novel potent inhibitor ligand which has the better potency, more binding energy and more  appropriate pharmacokinetic properties.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Yan Y., Zhou X.E., Novick S.J., Shaw S.J., Li Y., Brunzelle J.S., Melcher K., Structures of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Bound to Novel Pharmacological Activators in Phosphorylated, Non-Phosphorylated, and Nucleotide-Free StatesJournal of Biological Chemistry294(3): 953-967 (2019).
[2]  Rozpędek W., Pytel D., Nowak-Zduńczyk A., Lewko D., Wojtczak R., Diehl J.A., Majsterek, I., Breaking the DNA Damage Response Via Serine/Threonine Kinase Inhibitors to Improve Cancer Treatment. Current medicinal chemistry26(8): 1425-1445 (2019).
[3] Uitdehaag J.C., de Man J., Willemsen-Seegers N., Prinsen M.B., Libouban M.A., Sterrenburg J.G., Zaman G.J., Target Residence Time-Guided Optimization on TTK Kinase Results in Inhibitors with Potent Anti-Proliferative ActivityJournal of Molecular Biology429(14): 2211-2230 (2017).
[4] Guccione M., Ettari R., Taliani S., Da Settimo F., Zappalà M., Grasso S., G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 (GRK2) Inhibitors: Current Trends and Future PerspectivesJournal of medicinal chemistry59(20): 9277-9294 (2016).
[5] Thal D.M., Homan K.T., Chen J., Wu E.K., Hinkle P.M., Huang Z.M., Tesmer J.J., Paroxetine is a Direct Inhibitor of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 and Increases Myocardial ContractilityACS chemical biology7(11): 1830-1839 (2012).
[6] Yao H., Uras G., Zhang P., Xu S., Yin Y., Liu J., Xu J., Discovery of Novel Tacrine–Pyrimidone Hybrids as Potent Dual AChE/GSK-3 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s DiseaseJournal of Medicinal Chemistry64(11): 7483-7506 (2021).
[7] Lian X., Xia Z., Li X., Karpov P., Jin H., Tetko I.V., Wu S., Anti-MRSA Drug Discovery by Ligand-Based Virtual Screening and Biological EvaluationBioorganic Chemistry114: 105042 (2021).
[8] Mahdian S., Zarrabi M., Moini A., Shahhoseini M., Movahedi M., In Silico Evidence for Prednisone and Progesterone Efficacy in Recurrent Implantation Failure TreatmentJournal of Molecular Modeling28(4): 105 (2022).
[9] Glaab E., Building a Virtual Ligand Screening Pipeline Using Free Software: A Survey. Briefings in Bioinformatics17(2): 352-366 (2016).
[10] Azeez S., Babu R.O., Aykkal R., Narayanan, R., Virtual Screening and in Vitro Assay of Potential Drug Like Inhibitors from Spices Against Glutathione-S-Transferase of Filarial Nematodes. Journal of molecular modeling18: 151-163 (2012).
[12] Azmian Moghadam F., Kefayati H., Evazalipour M., Ghasemi S., Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and Docking Study of Novel 4-Anilinoquinazolines Derivatives as Anticancer Agents, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (IJCCE), 41: 353-367 (2022).
[13] Ibeji C.U., Oguejiofo U., Chukwuma Chime C., Akpomie K.G., Anarado C.J.O., Odewole O.A., Grishina M., Potemkin V., Dehydroacetic Acid-Phenylhydrazone as a Potential Inhibitor for Wild-Type HIV-1 Protease: Structural, DFT, Molecular Dynamics, 3D QSAR and ADMET Characteristics, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 40: 215-230 (2021).
[14] Zuo K., Qian J., Gong J., Zhang J., Li H., Zhou G., Synthesis, Characterization, Molecular Docking and Cytotoxicity Studies of Bagasse Xylem Ferulate-Acrylamide/Methyl Methacrylate Composite, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (IJCCE), 38: 107-116. (2019).
[15] Liu Z., Liu Q., Zhang B., Liu Q., Fang L., Gou S., Blood–Brain Barrier Permeable and No-Releasing Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment: Targeting NO/cGMP/CREB Signaling Pathways. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry64(18): 13853-13872 (2021).
[16] Roskoski Jr R., Properties of FDA-Approved Small Molecule Protein Kinase Inhibitors: A 2021 Update. Pharmacological research165: 105463 (2021).
[17] Setyawan J., Koide K., Diller T.C., Bunnage M.E., Taylor S.S., Nicolaou K.C., Brunton L.L., Inhibition of Protein Kinases by Balanol: Specificity Within the Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase Subfamily. Molecular pharmacology56(2): 370-376 (1999).
[18] Thal D.M., Yeow R.Y., Schoenau C., Huber J., Tesmer J.J.G., Molecular Mechanism of Selectivity among G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors, Molecular Pharmacology, 80: 294-303 (2011).
[19] Homan K.T., Larimore K.M., Elkins J.M., Szklarz M., Knapp S., Tesmer J.J., Identification and Structure–Function Analysis of Subfamily Selective G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase Inhibitors. ACS chemical biology10(1): 310-319 (2015).
[20] Kim S., Chen J., Cheng T., Gindulyte A., He J., He S., Bolton E.E., PubChem in 2021: New Data Content and Improved Web InterfacesNucleic acids research49(D1): D1388-D1395 (2021).
[21] O'Boyle N.M., Banck M., James C.A., Morley C., Vandermeersch T., Hutchison G.R., Open Babel: An Open Chemical ToolboxJournal of cheminformatics3(1): 1-14 (2011).
[22] Morris G.M., Huey R., Lindstrom W., Sanner M.F., Belew R.K., Goodsell D.S., Olson A.J., AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated Docking with Selective Receptor FlexibilityJournal of computational chemistry30(16): 2785-2791 (2009).
[23] Baldi P., Nasr R., When is Chemical Similarity Significant? The Statistical Distribution of Chemical Similarity Scores and Its Extreme ValuesJournal of chemical information and modeling50(7): 1205-1222 (2010).
[24] Xiong G., Wu Z., Yi J., Fu L., Yang Z., Hsieh C., Cao D., ADMETlab 2.0: an Integrated Online Platform for Accurate and Comprehensive Predictions of ADMET PropertiesNucleic Acids Research49(W1): W5-W14 (2021).
[25] Dong J., Wang N.N., Yao Z.J., Zhang L., Cheng Y., Ouyang D., Cao D.S., ADMETlab: a Platform for Systematic ADMET Evaluation Based on a Comprehensively Collected ADMET DatabaseJournal of cheminformatics10: 1-11 (2018).
[26] Azimi S., Mohammadi B., Babadoust S., Vessally E., In Silico Study and Design of Some New Potent Threonine Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Using Molecular Docking SimulationMolecular Simulation49(5): 517-524 (2023).