Nashrieh Shimi va Mohandesi Shimi Iran

Nashrieh Shimi va Mohandesi Shimi Iran

Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming reation using Gibbs free energy minimization method

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Peyman Taghavi Eishkooh 1
Reza Khoshbin 2
Erfan Aghaei 1
Ramin KarimZadeh 1
1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Buein Zahra Technical University, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract
In this paper, the thermodynamic equilibrium of the methanol steam reforming process (MSR) for hydrogen production was studied by Gibbs free energy minimization method. The effect of operating parameters such as temperature and steam/methanol ratio in feed stream (Steam/Carbon) on product distribution was evaluated. In order to investigate the amount of undesirable by-product in the equilibrium state, the side-reactions progress in the hydrogen-rich stream were analyzed in the certain operating range (temperature: 300-600 K and Steam/Carbon: 0.1-3). The optimum conditions were determined for maximizing methanol conversion, high hydrogen production yield and minimizing undesirable products such as CO and DME. In order to investigate the effect of presence of methane in the reaction medium on the hydrogen production yield and products selectivity, two separate thermodynamic analyses were performed assuming the presence or absence of methane in the product stream. In the presence of methane (case 2), the maximum hydrogen yield was about 10%. The results showed that in the absence of methane in the reaction medium, the suitable operation conditions limit for obtain the highest hydrogen yield and decrease of undesirable by-products were 450-600 K and a Steam/Carbon ratio above 1.5.
Keywords
Methanol
Reforming
Hydrogen
Thermodynamic
Gibbs free energy

Subjects

[1] Cheng Y.W., Lee Z.S., Chong C.C., Khan M.R., Cheng C.K., Ng K.H., Hossain S.S., Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Production Via Steam Reforming of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME)–a Thermodynamics Analysis, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(37): 20711-20724 (2019).
[2] Unlu D., Hilmioglu N.D., Application of Aspen Plus to Renewable Hydrogen Production from Glycerol by Steam Reforming, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(5): 3509-3515 (2020).
[3] Wu W., Chuang B.N., Hwang J.J., Lin C.K., Yang S.B., Techno-Economic Evaluation of a Hybrid Fuel Cell Vehicle with On-Board MeOH-to-H2 Processor, Applied Energy, 238: 401-412 (2019).
[4] Akansu S.O., Dulger Z., Kahraman N., Veziroǧlu T.N., Internal Combustion Engines Fueled by Natural Gas-Hydrogen Mixtures, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29(14): 1527-1539 (2004).
[5] Tahay P., Khani Y., Jabari M., Bahadoran F., Safari N., Highly Porous Monolith/TiO2 Supported Cu, Cu-Ni, Ru, and Pt Catalysts in Methanol Steam Reforming Process for H2 Generation, Applied Catalysis A: General, 55: 44-53 (2018).
[6] Mu X., Pan L., Liu N., Zhang C., Li S., Sun G., Wang S., Autothermal Reforming of Methanol in a Mini-Reactor for a Miniature Fuel Cell, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(15): 3327-3334 (2007).
[7] Baneshi J., Haghighi M., Jodeiri N., Abdollahifar M., Ajamein H., Homogeneous Precipitation Synthesis of CuO–ZrO2–CeO2–Al2O3 Nanocatalyst used in Hydrogen Production via Methanol Steam Reforming for Fuel Cell Applications, Energy Conversion and Management, 87: 928-937 (2014).
[8] Kim S., Yun S.W., Lee B., Heo J., Kim K., Kim Y.T., Lim H., Steam Reforming of Methanol for Ultra-Pure H2 Production in a Membrane Reactor: Techno-Economic Analysis, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(4): 2330-2339 (2019).
[9] Qureshi F., Ahmad F., Idrees M., Khan A.A., Zaidi S., Simulation of Methanol Steam Reforming Process for the Production of Hydrogen, Indian Chemical Engineer, 1-18 (2019).
[10] Xing S., Zhao C., Ban S., Liu Y., Wang H., Thermodynamic Performance Analysis of the Influence of Multi-Factor Coupling on the Methanol Steam Reforming Reaction, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(11): 7015-7024 (2020).
[11] Sanz O., Velasco I., Pérez-Miqueo I., Poyato R., Odriozola J.A., Montes M., Intensification of Hydrogen Production by Methanol Steam Reforming, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(10): 5250-5259 (2016).
[12] Özcan O., Akın A.N., Thermodynamic Analysis of Methanol Steam Reforming to Produce Hydrogen for HT-PEMFC: An Optimization Study, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(27): 14117-14126 (2019).
[13] Thattarathody R., Sheintuch M., Kinetics and Dynamics of Methanol Steam Reforming on CuO/ZnO/Alumina Catalyst, Applied Catalysis A: General, 540: 47-56 (2017).
[14] Iruretagoyena D., Hellgardt K., Chadwick D., Towards Autothermal Hydrogen Production by Sorption-Enhanced Water Gas Shift and Methanol Reforming: A Thermodynamic Analysis, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(9): 4211-4222 (2018).
[15] Katiyar N., Kumar S., Kumar S., Comparative Thermodynamic Analysis of Adsorption, Membrane and Adsorption-Membrane Hybrid Reactor Systems for Methanol Steam Reforming, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(3): 1363-1375 (2013).
[16] Katiyar N., Kumar S., Kumar S., Thermodynamic Analysis for Quantifying Fuel Cell Grade H2 Production by Methanol Steam Reforming, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 36(4): 581-590 (2013).
[17] Voll F., Rossi C., Silva C., Guirardello R., Souza R., Cabral V., Cardozo-Filho L., Thermodynamic Analysis of Supercritical Water Gasification of Methanol, Ethanol, Glycerol, Glucose and Cellulose, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(24): 9737-9744 (2009).
[18] Yong S.T., Ooi C.W., Chai S.P., Wu X., Review of Methanol Reforming-Cu-Based Catalysts, Surface Reaction Mechanisms, and Reaction Schemes, International Journal of hydrogen energy, 38(22): 9541-9552 (2013).
[19] Sá S., Silva H., Brandão L., Sousa J.M., Mendes A., Catalysts for Methanol Steam Reforming-A review, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 99(1-2): 43-57 (2010).