Numerical Analysis of Combustion Thermodynamics and Kinetic of Liquid Propellant Based on Hydrogen and Methane

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Chemical Engineering, Imam Hussein Comprehensive University, Tehran, I.R.IRAN

Abstract

The adequate understanding of sustained combustion and performance control in liquid propulsion engines requires sufficient knowledge about combustion chamber conditions, a series of chemical reactions that occur in the combustion chamber, and the thermo-physical variables based on the chemical reactions. For this purpose, after studying the governing equations and simulating the combustion chamber in different equivalence ratios, the distribution of temperature, chemical reaction rate, and mass fraction of chemical species are presented as the foundation for the challenges of the combustion chamber and related systems design. The simulation results desirably predict and justify many properties related to hydrogen-oxygen and methane-oxygen propellants. For methane-oxygen propellant due to the production of carbon monoxide at high ratios of fuel to oxidizer, a decrease in specific impulse, temperature, and chemical reaction rate of propellant is observed in the combustion chamber. The maximum temperature in the combustion chamber and the areas near the injectors for this propellant is much higher than the hydrogen-oxygen propellant at the equivalence ratio equal to one. Higher temperatures can cause serious harm to the combustion chamber wall, propellant transmission system, and injectors. Improving the nozzle design can also convert the thermal energy of the combustion gases into kinetic energy and velocity and can increase the specific impulse.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Krzycki L.J., “How to Design, Build and Test Small Liquid-Fuel Rocket Engines”, Rocketry, United States of America, (1967).
[3] Sqrensen K.A., Lupemba S.K., Paludan J., Lippert E.H., “Designing a Thrust Chamber”, DTU space, Denmark (2017).
[4] Sharma K.A., Samy P.A., Kumar S.S., Parammasivam K.M., “Numerical Modeling of Supercritical Combustion in Lox/Methane Multielement Chamber”, International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Germany, (2018).
[7] Kato T., Terakado D., Nanri H., Morito T., Masuda I., Asakawa H., sacaguchi H., Ishikawa Y., Inoue T., Ishihara S., Sasaki M., “Subscale Firing Test for Regenerative Cooling Lox/Methane Rocket Engine”,7 th european conference for aeronautics and space sciences, (2015).
[8] Fasal Khan M., Quadri Z.A., Kulkarni P.S., Guven U., Bhat S.P., Sundarraj K., “CFD Simulation of a Liquid Rocket Propellant (LH2/Lox) Combustion Chamber”, 15th Annual CFD Sympos, Bangalore, India, (2013).
[9] Cutrone L., Battista F., Ranuzzi G., Bonifacio S., Steelant J., “A CFD Method for Simulation of Mixing and Combustion in High-Pressure Lox/Methane Rocket Engines”, In 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, (2008).
[10] Song J., Sun B., Coupled Numerical Simulation of Combustion and Regenerative Cooling in Lox/Methane Rocket Engines, Applied Thermal Engineering106: 762-773 (2016).
[11] Pandey K.M., Yadav S.K., CFD Analysis of a Rocket Nozzle with Four Inlets at Mach 2.1, International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications1(4): 319-325 (2010).
[12] Shabanian S.R., Rahimi M., Khoshhal A., CFD Study on Hydrogen-Air Premixed Combustion in a Micro Scale Chamber, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (IJCCE)29(4): 161-172 (2010).
[13] Gupta P.K., Nayak V.S., Gupta A., Numerical Investigation of a Liquid Propellant Rocket (LH2/Lox) Combustion Chamber with Various Operational Condition and Micro-Gravity Effect by CFD, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 5(9): 1636-1642 (2018).
[14] Pimental R.G., “Measurement and Prediction of Droplet Size Distribution in Sprays”, PhD thesis, Laval University, (2006).
[15] Ajinkya V., Pandit A., Kumar, Srinivasa R.G., Kedarnath C., Srihari R., Vivek V.R., Modeling of Liquid Propellant Combustion Chamber, Chemical engineering journal207: 151-166 (2012).
[16] Liang P.Y., Fisher S., Mason Y.C., Comprehensive Modeling of a Liquid Rocket Combustion Chamber, Journal of Propulsion and Power (JPP), 2(2): 97-104 (1986).
[17] Jamali A.A., Shahhosseini S., Behjat Y., Experimental Evaluation and Modeling of Liquid Jet Penetration to Estimate Droplet Size in a Three-Phase Riser Reactor, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 24(2): 293–309 (2016).
[18] Davidson L., “An Introduction to Turbulence Models”, AVANCEZ, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, (2018).
[19] Bosenhofer M., Wartha E.M., Jordan C., Harasek M., The Eddy Dissipation Concept-Analysis of Different Fine Structure Treatments for Classical Combustion, Energies11(7): 1902 (2018).
[20] Magnussen B.F., The Eddy Dissipation Concept a Bridge between Science and Technology, Energies, 11(7): 1902 (2005).
[22] Burke M. P., Chaos M., Yiguang J. U., Dryer F. L., Klippenstein S. J., Comprehensive H2/O2 Kinetic Model for High-Pressure Combustion, International Journal of Chemical Kinetics44(7): 444-474 (2011).
[23] Andersen J., Rasmussen C. L., Giselsson T., Glarborg P., Global Combustion Mechanisms for Use in CFD Modeling Under Oxy-Fuel Conditions, Energy & Fuels, 23(3): 1379-1389 (2009).
[24] Jones W.P., Lindstedt R.P., Global Reaction Schemes for Hydrocarbon Combustion, Combustion and Flame, 73(3): 233-249 (1988).
[25] Westbrook C.K., Dryer F.L., Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames, Combustion science and technology27(1-2): 31-43 (1981).
[26] De Giorgi M.G., Sciolti A., Ficarella A., Application and Comparison of Different Combustion Models of High-Pressure Lox/CH4 Jet Flames, Energies7(1): 477-497 (2014).
[27] Kubota N., “Propellants and Explosives: Thermochemical Aspects of Combustion”, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Germany, (2015).