Scheduling and Optimization of Production and Injection in Cyclic Water Flooding

Document Type : Research Article


Faculty of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, I.R. IRAN


Water flooding is one of the common secondary recovery methods. One of the major problems of water flooding is the production of water. Consequently, water breakthrough happens quickly. In these conditions, the production of the reservoir is not economical. In comparison to conventional flooding, cyclic water flooding (CWF) produces more oil and less water. CWF is performed to produce oil from a zone with less permeability that cannot be displaced. Studies have shown that oil production is more likely to occur during the period of injector shut-in. To achieve maximum oil production from oil fields and less produced water, optimization methods should be used in the process of cyclic water injection. By controlling and optimizing the well parameters, such as production and injection rates, as well as the economic evaluation of the process, one can achieve this goal. The purpose of this study is the scheduling and optimization of production using net present value (NPV) for this process. In this research, two-dimensional and three-dimensional models from reliable literature data are simulated. After validation and comparison to the literature, the sensitivity of the model for the duration of injection and shut-in of the injector is performed in CWF. To optimize, we used the genetic algorithm, which is an efficient stochastic approach without the requirement of derivative calculation. The results showed that the CWF in a two-dimensional model in water-wet and oil-wet reservoirs has increased in NPV value of 2.26% and 3.9% respectively. In 3D model, the results showed NPV value in the cyclic flooding method in comparison to conventional flooding in the oil-wet reservoir has increased 3.285% and, in the water-wet reservoirs decreased 3.038%. The result of this study suggests CWF as a suitable secondary recovery approach in comparison to conventional flooding, especially oil-wet reservoirs.


Main Subjects

[1]    Civan, F. Injectivity of the Waterflooding Wells, Reserv. Form. Damage, 775-813 (2007)
[2]    Al-Shalabi E. W. Ghosh, B. Flow Visualization of Fingering Phenomenon and Its Impact on Waterflood Oil Recovery, J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol., 8(1): 217-228 (2018)
[3]    Surguchev  L. Koundin A. Melberg O. Rolfsvag T.A. Menard W.P. Cyclic Water Injection: Improved Oil Recovery at Zero Cost, Pet. Geosci., 8(1): 89-95 (2002)
[4]    Langdalen, H. “Cyclic Water Injection”, Mater thesis, NTNU, June, (2014)
[5]    Groenenboom, J. Wong, S. Meling, T. Zschuppe, R. Davidson, B. “Pulsed Water Injection During Waterflooding”, SPE, 1-16, (2003)
[6]    Putra E. New I.T.B. Schechter D.S. “SPE 54336 Reservoir Simulation of a Waterflood Pilot in the Naturally Fractured Spraberry Trend” (1999)
[7]    Iris A.A.S. Iris L M.S. Statoilhydro S.R.J. “SPE 116873 Improved Oil Recovery by Cyclic Injection and Production,” October, 28-30, (2008)
[8]    Surguchev L. Giske N.H. Kollbotn L. Iris A.S. “SPE 117836 Cyclic Water Injection Improves Oil Production in Carbonate Reservoir”, 1-13 (2008)
[10] Kulathu S. Dandekar,A.Y., Patil S. Khataniar S. “Low Salinity Cyclic Water Floods for Enhanced Oil Recovery on Alaska North Slope,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - SPE Asia Pacific Oil Gas Conf. Exhib. APOGCE 2013 Maximising Matur. Elev. Young, 1: (2013)
[11] Zhongrong L., Xianzhi S., Yongsong Q., Xuezhong C., "Methods and Effects of Cyclic Waterflooding in the Southern Oilfields of Daqing Placanticline". Society of Petroleum Engineers (1997).
[12] Qingfeng Y., Bingyu J., 'Jiping Y. Mechanism of Cyclic in Waterflooding in Vertically Heterogeneous Reservoirs". Society of Petroleum Engineers (1997)
[13] Hu H. Wu J. Xie M. Sun X., Zhang Y. Optimized Cyclic Water Injection Strategy for Oil Recovery in Low-Permeability Reservoirs, J. Energy Resour. Technol., 141(1): 12905 (2018)
[14] Cheng T.C.E. Peng B., Lü Z. A Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm to Solve the Job Shop Scheduling Problem, Ann. Oper. Res., 242(2): 223-237 (2016)
[15] Tianyi G., Yuping W. Yuanhui, Yangyang Z., Berth H., Allocation Optimization with Priority Based on Simulated Annealing Algorithm, J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev., 11(1): 74-83, (2018)
[16] Weinstein H.G. Chappelear J.E. Nolen J.S., Second Comparative Solution Project: A Three-Phase Coning Study, J. Pet. Technol., 38(3): 345-353 (2007)
[17]         Azamipour V. Assareh M. “An Injection Rate Optimization in a Water Flooding Case Study with an Adaptive Simulated Annealing Techniques”, J. Pet. Sci. Technol. 7(4): 13-31 (2017).