The Comparison of Thermal and Hydrodynamic Performance between Graphene Oxide and Alumina Nanofluids Operated in a Plate Heat Exchanger

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Department of Chemical Engineering, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, I.R. IRAN

Abstract

The aim of this experimental study is to investigate the thermal and hydrodynamic performance of graphene oxide and alumina nanofluids with two types of nanoparticle shapes in a plate heat exchanger. The nanofluids with a weight fraction of 0.1% were prepared by dispersing nanoparticles in pure water via a probe ultrasonic apparatus and a vigorous mechanical mixer. Then, the thermo-physical properties of the nanofluids including thermal conductivity and viscosity were analyzed and compared. For the thermal test, a heating system including a brazed plate exchanger equipped with two pumps, two flowmeters, four thermometers, two storage tanks, and insulated steel tubes was set up. The flow rate of hot fluid (pure water) was fixed and the nanofluid was used as cold fluid to cool the hot fluid at flowrates of 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 L/min. Thermal and hydrodynamic performance was investigated by calculating heat transfer rate, Nusselt number, friction coefficient, pressure drop, pumping power, and finally the performance coefficient criterion (the ratio of heat transfer obtained to pumping power consumed). In comparison with water, the highest enhancement in heat transfer was obtained at the lowest flow rate of graphene oxide and alumina nanofluids to the extent of 46% and 18 %, respectively. This study showed that the maximum performance index was related to the graphene oxide nanofluid at flowrates less than 2.5 L/min, while at flowrates higher than 2.5 L/min, the performance index of graphene oxide nanofluid showed a significant drop and was lower than alumina nanofluid.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Thulukkanam K., "Heat Exchanger Design Handbook", CRC press, (2013).
[2] بزرگان ن.، مبری م.، وحیدی نیا ف.، کاربرد نانوسیال آب-آلومینا گاما در مبدل گرمایی پوسته و لوله در غلظت‌های حجمی گوناگون، نشریه شیمی و مهندسی شیمی ایران، (2)35: 139 تا 149 (1395).
[3] Kumar V., Tiwari AK., Ghosh SK., Application of Nanofluids in Plate Heat Exchanger: A Review, Energy Conversion and Management, 105: 1017-1036 (2015).
[4] Yu W., Xie H., A Review on Nanofluids: Preparation, Stability Mechanisms, and Applications, Journal of Nanomaterials, 2012: 1-17 (2012).
[5] Jang S.P., Choi S.U., Role of Brownian Motion in the Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids, Applied Physics Letters, 84(21): 4316-4318 (2004).
[6] Pantzali M.N., Mouza A.A., Paras S.V., Investigating the Efficacy of Nanofluids as Coolants in Plate Heat Exchangers (PHE), Chemical Engineering Science, 64(14): 3290-3300 (2009).
[7] Tiwari A.K., Ghosh P., Sarkar J., Performance Comparison of the Plate Heat Exchanger using Different Nanofluids, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 49: 141-151 (2013).
[8] Tiwari A.K., Ghosh P., Sarkar J., Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Characteristics of CeO2/Water Nanofluid in Plate Heat Exchanger, Applied Thermal Engineering, 57(1-2): 24-32 (2013).
[9] Javadi F.S., Sadeghipour S., Saidur R., BoroumandJazi G., Rahmati B., Elias M.M., Sohel M.R., The Effects of Nanofluid on Thermo Physical Properties and Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Plate Heat Exchanger, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 44: 58-63 (2013).
[10] Kwon Y.H., Kim D., Li C.G., Lee J.K., Hong D.S., Lee J.G., Lee S.H., Cho Y.H., Kim S.H., Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Characteristics of Nanofluids in a Plate Heat Exchanger, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 11(7): 5769-5774 (2011).
[11] Pandey S.D., Nema V.K., Experimental Analysis of Heat Transfer and Friction Factor of Nanofluid as a Coolant in a Corrugated Plate Heat Exchanger, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 38: 248-256 (2012).
[12] Balandin A.A., Thermal Properties of Graphene and Nanostructured Carbon Materials, Nature Materials, 10(8): 569-581 (2011).
[13] Goodarzi M., Amiri A., Goodarzi M.S., Safaei M.R., Karimipour A., Languri E.M., Dahari M., Investigation of Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop of a Counter Flow Corrugated Plate Heat Exchanger using MWCNT based Nanofluids, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 66: 172-179 (2015).
[15] Sarafraz M.M., Hormozi F., Heat Transfer, Pressure Drop and Fouling Studies of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Nano-Fluids Inside a Plate Heat Exchanger, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 72: 1-11 (2016).
[16] Sarafraz M.M, Hormozi F., Nikkhah V., Thermal Performance of a Counter-Current Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Working with COOH-CNT/Water Nanofluids, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 78: 41-49 (2016).
[17] Esfahani M.R, Languri E.M., Exergy Analysis of a Shell-And-Tube Heat Exchanger using Graphene Oxide Nanofluids, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 83: 100-106 (2017).
[18] Wang Z., Wu Z., Han F., Wadsö L., Sundén B., Experimental Comparative Evaluation of a Graphene Nanofluid Coolant in Miniature Plate Heat Exchanger, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 130: 148-156 (2018).
[19] Vivekchand S.R, Rout C.S., Subrahmanyam K.S., Govindaraj A., Rao C.N., Graphene-based Electrochemical Supercapacitors, Journal of Chemical Sciences, 120(1): 9-13 (2008).
[20] Park S.D., Won Lee S., Kang S., Bang I.C., Kim J.H., Shin H.S., Lee D.W., Won Lee D., Effects of Nanofluids Containing Graphene/Graphene-Oxide Nanosheets on Critical Heat Flux, Applied Physics Letters, 97(2): 023103 (2010).
[21] Hajjar Z., Rashidi A.M., Ghozatloo A., Enhanced Thermal Conductivities of Graphene Oxide Nanofluids, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 57: 128-131 (2014).
[22] Vajjha R.S., Das D.K., A Review and Analysis on Influence of Temperature and Concentration of Nanofluids on Thermo Physical Properties, Heat Transfer and Pumping Power, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 55(15-16): 4063-4078 (2012).
[23] Ganvir R.B., Walke P.V., Kriplani V.M., Heat Transfer Characteristics in Nanofluid a Review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75: 451-460 (2017).
[24] Esfahani M.R., Languri E.M., Nunna M.R., Effect of Particle Size and Viscosity on Thermal Conductivity Enhancement of Graphene Oxide Nanofluid, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 76: 308-315 (2016).
[25] Mehrali M., Sadeghinezhad E., Akhiani A.R., Latibari S.T., Talebian S., Dolatshahi-Pirouz A., Metselaar H.S., Mehrali M., An Eco-Friendly Graphene-based Nanofluid for Heat Transfer Applications, Journal of Cleaner Production, 137: 555-566 (2016).
[26] Suganthi K.S., Rajan K.S., Metal oxide nanofluids: Review of Formulation, Thermo-Physical Properties, Mechanisms, and Heat Transfer Performance, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76: 226-255 (2017).
[27] Choudhary R., Khurana D., Kumar A., Subudhi S., Stability Analysis of Al2O3/Water Nanofluids, Journal of Experimental Nanoscience, 12(1): 140-151 (2017).
[30] Ranjbarzadeh R., Karimipour A., Afrand M., Isfahani A.H., Shirneshan A., Empirical Analysis of Heat Transfer and Friction Factor of Water/Graphene Oxide Nanofluid Flow in Turbulent Regime through an Isothermal Pipe, Applied Thermal Engineering, 126: 538-547 (2017).
[31] غیاثی ا.، بنی اسدی ح.، اکبری ا.، تولید گرافن آب دوست و بررسی تجربی افزودن آن بر بهبود ضریب انتقال گرما در سامانه آب/اتیلن‌گلیکول، نشریه شیمی و مهندسی شیمی ایران، (1)39: 39 تا 52 (1398).
[33] Shima P.D., Philip J., Raj B., Influence of Aggregation on Thermal Conductivity in Stable and Unstable Nanofluids, Applied Physics Letters, 97(15): 153113 (2010).
[34] Ijam A., Saidur R., Ganesan P., Golsheikh A.M., Stability, Thermo-Physical Properties, and Electrical Conductivity of Graphene Oxide-Deionized Water/Ethylene Glycol Based Nanofluid, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 87: 92-103 (2015).
[35] Kakaç S., Pramuanjaroenkij A., Review of Convective Heat Transfer Enhancement with Nanofluids, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 52(13-14): 3187-3196 (2009).
[36] Bergman T.L., Incropera F.P., Lavine A.S., DeWitt D.P., “Introduction to Heat Transfer”, John Wiley & Sons Inc, (2011).