Simulation, Control and Sensitivity Analysis of Thermal Cracking Furnaces of Olefin Unit of Morvarid Petrochemical

Document Type : Research Article


Department of Chemical Engineering, Shahid Nikbakht Faculty of Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, I.R. IRAN


Ethylene is one of the most important basic materials in petrochemical industries. It is used as raw material in the production of many chemicals, such as polyethylene and ethylene glycol. The thermal cracking of hydrocarbons, such as ethane, is the most commonly used process for ethylene production. Thermal cracking furnaces provide the required energy for cracking ethane to ethylene. In this research, the cracking furnaces of the Morvarid petrochemical complex was simulated and controlled and sensitivity analysis were performed. For this purpose, firstly the unit was simulated in steady state using Aspen Plus® and after ensuring simulation accuracy, the results were used as the starting point for dynamic simulation in Aspen Dynamic® and the dynamic behavior of the unit was studied. The accuracy of this simulation was satisfactory in dynamic and steady-state forms, so that the average error of stream information compared to the design data were 0.42% and 1.15% for steady-state and dynamic simulation, respectively. Then the feed flow rate stepwise increased to 6.6% of the initial flow rate while the ethylene conversion was controlled at 38.5%. In order to achieve this conversion, the temperature of the thermal cracking furnaces increased to 1131℃ with increasing feed flow rate. With this changes, change of ethylene product flow rate was 0.86 of feedstock changes. Then, the change in the feed composition was investigated whilst the propane concentration in the feed stream was increased gradually as well as the ethane concentration was decreased by 10%. In this case, the mass fraction of propane in the feed flow was changed from 2.52% to 12.52%. Due to these changes and without changing the unit operating condition, finally, the ethylene flow rate decreased 3.3% compared to the primary state.


[1] Van Geem K., “Single Event Micro Kinetic Model for Steam Cracking of Hydrocarbons”, Ghent University (2006).
[2] Matar S., Hatch L.F., “Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes”, Gulf Professional Publishing (2001).
[3] Belohlav Z., Zamostny P., Herink T., The Kinetic Model of Thermal Cracking for Olefins Production, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 42: 461-473 (2003).
[4] Zimmermann H., Walzl R., “Ethylene”, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley, (2000).
[5] Karimzadeh R., Godini H.R., Ghashghaee M., Flowsheeting of Steam Cracking Furnaces, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 87: 36-46 (2009).
[6] Towfighi J., Niaei A., Karimzadeh R., Saedi G., Systematics and Modelling Representations of LPG Thermal Cracking for Olefin Production, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 23: 8-16 (2006).
[7] Gujarathi A., Patle D.S., Agarwal P., Karemore A.L., Babu B., Simulation and Analysis of Ethane Cracking Process, Proceedings of International Symposium & 62nd Annual Session of IIChE in association with International Partners (CHEMCON-2009), Andhra University, Visakhapatnam (2009).
[8] Van Damme P., Narayanan S., Froment G., Thermal Cracking of Propane and Propane‐Propylene Mixtures: Pilot Plant Versus Industrial Data, AIChE Journal, 21: 1065-1073 (1975).
[9] Sundaram K., Froment G., Modeling of Thermal Cracking Kinetics—I: Thermal Cracking of Ethane, Propane and their Mixtures, Chemical Engineering Science, 32: 601-608 (1977).
[10] Froment G.P., Van de Steene B.O., Van Damme P.S., Narayanan S., Goossens A.G., Thermal Cracking of Ethane and Ethane-Propane Mixtures, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 15: 495-504 (1976).
[11] Kumar P., Kunzru D., Modeling of Naphtha Pyrolysis, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 24: 774-782 (1985).
[12] Zou R., Lou Q., Mo S., Feng S., Study on a Kinetic Model of Atmospheric Gas Oil Pyrolysis and Coke Deposition, Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 32: 843-847 (1993).
[13] Masoumi M., Sadrameli S., Towfighi J., Niaei A., Simulation, Optimization and Control of a Thermal Cracking Furnace, Energy, 31: 516-527 (2006).
[14] Gao G.Y., Wang M., Pantelides C., Li X.G., Yeung H., Mathematical Modeling and Optimal Operation of Industrial Tubular Reactor for Naphtha Cracking, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 27: 501-506 (2009).
[15] Zarinabadi S., Samimi A., Marouf M.S., Modeling and Simulation for Olefin Production in Amir Kabir Petrochemical, 14th International Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Congress, Iran, (2010).
[16] Berreni M., Wang M., Modelling and Dynamic Optimization of Thermal Cracking of Propane for Ethylene Manufacturing, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35: 2876-2885 (2011).
[17] Guihua H., Honggang W., Feng Q., Numerical Simulation on Flow, Combustion and Heat Transfer of Ethylene Cracking Furnaces, Chemical Engineering Science, 66: 1600-1611 (2011).
[18] Haghighi S.S., Rahimpour M., Raeissi S., Dehghani O., Investigation of Ethylene Production in Naphtha Thermal Cracking Plant in Presence of Steam and Carbon Dioxide, Chemical engineering journal, 228: 1158-1167 (2013).
[19] Barazandeh K., Dehghani O., Hamidi M., Aryafard E., Rahimpour M.R., Investigation of Coil Outlet Temperature Effect on the Performance of Naphtha Cracking Furnace, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 94: 307-316 (2015).
[20] ترجمان ع.، بازیار ع.، قاضی‌زاده ع.، انتخاب مدل‌های ترمودینامیکی برای شبیه‌سازی فرایندهای شیمیایی، نخستین همایش مهندسی فرآیند در صنایع نفت، گاز، پتروشیمی و انرژی، تهران، ایران، (1393).
[21] Ranjan P., Kannan P., Al Shoaibi A., Srinivasakannan C., Modeling of Ethane Thermal Cracking Kinetics in a Pyrocracker, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 35: 1093-1097 (2012).
[22] Luyben W.L., “Distillation Design and Control Using Aspen Simulation”, John Wiley & Sons, (2013).
[23] Luyben W.L., Chemical Reactor Design and Control, John Wiley & Sons, (2007).
[24] Levenspiel O., Chemical Reaction Engineering, Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 38: 4140-4143 (1999).